Prior to 1871, the federal government sometimes negotiated treaties with Native American tribes.Į. Prior to the Lone Wolf decision, the Supreme Court was reluctant to hear cases involving agreements negotiated between Congress and Native American tribes.ĭ. Some Native American tribes were more eager to negotiate treaties with the United States after the Lone Wolf decision.Ĭ. Some Native American tribes approved of the congressional action of 1871 because it simplified their dealings with the federal government.ī. But in reality, the federal government continued to negotiate formal tribal agreements past the turn of the century.Ī. ***********************-Īccording to the passage, which of the following was true of relations between the federal government and Native American tribes?īackground - Answer will be explicitly mention in the passage.Ĭongress abolished the making of treaties with Native American tribes. exploring the relationship between law and social reality analyzing the significance of a historical event - Correct align with pre-think.ĭ. evaluating a work of scholarship -( Yes author put some light on a Work of Blue Clarke but this not the primary purpose.)Ĭ. identifying similarities in two different theories (not theories)ī. The author of the passage is primarily concerned withĪ. (Note by reading 1st line of P2 we may think that author will explain about Blue Clark’s study in this paragraph, but in last line it is clear that author is still talking about decision.)īy passage summary we can pre-think that author is discussing about decision. P2 :- About decision's far reaching impact. P1:- About decision in the case of Lone Walk and Blue Clark' study. The Lone Wolf decision ended this era of formal negotiation and finally did away with what had increasingly become the empty formality of obtaining tribal consent. But in reality, the federal government continued to negotiate formal tribal agreements past the turn of the century, treating theseĭocuments not as treaties with sovereign nations requiring ratification by the Senate but simply as legislation to be passed by both houses of Congress. Many commentators believe that this change had already occurred in 1871 when following a dispute between the House and the Senate over which chamber should enjoy primacy in Indian affairs-Congress abolished the making of treaties with Native American tribes. In his study of the Lone Wolf case, Blue Clark properly emphasizes the Court’s assertion of a virtually unlimited unilateral power of Congress (the House of Representatives and the Senate) over Native American affairs.īut he fails to note the decision’s more far-reaching impact: shortly after Lone Wolf, the federal government totally abandoned negotiation and execution of formal written agreements with Indian tribes as a prerequisite for the implementation of federal Indian policy. Hitchcock, the United States Supreme Court rejected the Line efforts of three Native American tribes to prevent the opening of tribal lands to non-Indian settlement without tribal consent. In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. But in reality the federal government continued to negotiate formal tribal agreements past the turn of the century, treating these documents not as treaties with sovereign nations requiring ratification by the Senate but simply as legislation to be passed by both houses of Congress. Many commentators believe that this change had already occurred in 1871 when-following a dispute between the House and the Senate over which chamber should enjoy primacy in Indian affairs-Congress abolished the making of treaties with Native American tribes. But he fails to note the decision’s more far-reaching impact: shortly after Lone Wolf, the federal government totally abandoned negotiation and execution of formal written agreements with Indian tribes as a prerequisite for the implementation of federal Indian policy. In his study of the Lone Wolf case, Blue Clark properly emphasizes the Court’s assertion of a virtually unlimited unilateral power of Congress (the House of Representatives and the Senate) over Native American affairs. Hitchcock, the United States Supreme Court rejected the efforts of three Native American tribes to prevent the opening of tribal lands to non-Indian settlement without tribal consent.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |